Alvino, L. A. (2003). Who’s watching the watchdogs? Responding to the erosion of research ethics by enforcing promises. Columbia Law Review 103, 893-924.

Amdur, R. J. & Bankert, E. A. (2001). Institutional review board: Management and function. Sudbury MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishing.

Amdur, R. J. (2003). The institutional review board member handbook. Sudbury MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishing.

Ashcroft, R., & Pfeffer, N. (2001). Ethics behind closed doors: Do research ethics committees need secrecy? British Medical Journal 322, 1294-1296.

Bekelman, J. E. B., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(4), 454-465.

Bevan, J. (2000). Research ethics: An evolving discipline. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 47(1), 5-9.

Bevan, J. C. (2002). Towards the regulation of research ethics boards. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49(9), 900-906.

Beyrer, C. & Kass, N. E. (2002). Human rights, politics, and reviews of research ethics. The Lancet, 360(9328), 246-251.

Blunt J., Savulescu, J., & Watson, A. J. (1998). Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: Some practical suggestions. British Medical Journal, 316:58-61.

Canadian Institutes for Health Research. (2006). Developing a CIHR framework to measure the impact of health research. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 11 2007.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2005). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa: Interagency Secretariat on Research Ethics. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

Cave, E., & Holm, S. (2002). New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: Is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 318-321.

Centre for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at IIT. (2006). Scientific research ethics resources. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

Cornell University Committee on Human Subjects. (2005). Training program for researchers in the use of human subjects: Social and behavioural sciences. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

CSMLS. (2001). Code of professional conduct. [Online]. Hamilton: Canadian Society for Medical Laboratory Science. Available HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

De Koninck, M. (2005). Social responsibility in research. [Online]. In, The responsible conduct of research: The normative frameworks. ETH64841 course notes, University of Laval. Available: HERE Accessed February 5 2007.

Dinsdale, H. (2005). Professional responsibility and the protection of human subjects of research in Canada. Health Law Review, 13(2-3), 80-85.

Eckstein, S. (2003). Manual for research ethics committees, 6th ed. London: Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King’s College.

Edwards, S. J. L., Ashcroft, R., & Kirchin, S. (2004). Research ethics committees: Differences and moral judgement. Bioethics, 18(5), 408-427.

Edwards, S. J. L., Kirchin, S. & Huxtable, R. (2004). Research ethics committees and paternalism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 88-91.

Elliott, D., & Stern, J. E. (Eds.) (1997). Research ethics: A reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

Felo, A. J. (2001). Ethics programs, board involvement, and potential conflicts of interest in corporate governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 205-218.

Gardiner, H. P (2005). Ethical review for systematic investigations involving human subjects: Determining the need for research ethics board review in health and human service organizations. Unpublished PhD thesis. Calgary: University of Calgary.

Gelling, L. (1999). Role of the research ethics committee. Nurse Education Today, 19(7), 564-569.

Gold, J. L. (2003). Watching the watchdogs: Negligence, liability, and research ethics boards. Health Law Journal 11, 153-176.

Guillemin, M, & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261-280.

Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391-414.

Halasa, K. (2005). Annotated bibliography: Ethics in educational research. Association for Active Educational Researchers. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 5 2007.

Harvard University. (2004). Harvard ethics training in human research. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007

Health Canada. (2001). Natural health products regulation. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 5 2007.

Howe, K. R. & Moses, Michele S. (1999). Ethics in Educational Research. Review of Research in Education, 24, pp. 21-59.

Howe, K. R., Dougherty, K. C. (1993). Ethics, institutional review boards, and the changing face of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(9), 16-21.

Inter-Agency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. (2004). Introductory tutorial for the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for Research involving humans (TCPS). Glossary.  [Online]. Available: HERE

Inter-Agency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. (2004). Introductory tutorial for the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for Research involving humans (TCPS). [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 15 2007.

Israel, M. & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. London: Sage Publications.
Jamrozik, K. (2004). Research ethics paperwork: What is the plot we seem to have lost? British Medical Journal 329, 286-287.

Kieth-Spiegel, P., Koocher, G., & Tabachnik, B. (2006). What scientists want from their research ethics committee. Journal of Empirical Research in Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 67-82.

Kopelman, L. M. (2004). Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29(3), 351-378.

Little, M. (1999). Research, ethics and conflicts of interest. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(3), 259-262.

Lo, B. (1987). Behind closed doors: Promises and pitfalls of ethics committees. New England Journal of Medicine 317(1), 46-50.

London, A. J. (2005). Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice. American Journal of Bioethics, 5(1), 37-39.

Loue, S. (2000). Textbook of research ethics. New York: Springer.

Lougheed, T. (2003). A question of ethics. University Affairs, June/Jul, 10-

Macrina, F. (2005). Scientific integrity: Texts and cases in responsible conduct of research. Washington DC: American Society of Microbiology.

McDonald, M. (2001). Canadian governance of health research involving human subjects. Is anybody minding the store? Health Law Journal, 9, 1-21.

McMaster University Office of Research Services. (no date). Research ethics tutorial at McMaster University. Hamilton ON: McMaster University. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007

National Health and Medical Research Council. (1999). National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

National Health and Medical Research Council. (2001). Human research ethics handbook: Commentary on the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans. Canberra: NHMRC.

National Institutes of Health. (2006). Bioethics resources on the web. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

North Carolina State University. (1998). Research and professional ethics program: Resource guide in research ethics. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

Pimple, K. D. (2006). A short list of useful resources for teaching research ethics. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

Piquernal, N. (2000). Four principles to guide research with aboriginals. Policy Options, December, 49-51.

Practical Ethics Center at the University of Montana. (no date). Online research ethics course. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007

ProGroup. (2005). Refinements to the proportionate approach to research ethics review in the TCPS: A discussion paper. Ottawa: Subgroup of Procedural Issues for the TCPS (ProGroup): A working committee of the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics (PRE). Available: HERE Accessed January 11 2005.

Research Ethics Framework. (2004). Developing a framework for social science research ethics. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 5 2007-01-05.

Rhodes, R. (2005). Rethinking research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics, 5(1), 7-28.

Richards, H. M. & Schwartz, L. J. (2002). Ethics of qualitative research: Are there special issues for health services research? Family Practice, 19, 135-139.

Roth, W-M., (2004). Qualitative research and ethics. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2). [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 5 2007.

Ruttan, L. Exploring ethical principles in the context of research relationships. Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 2(1), 11-28.

Santé et services sociaux Québec. (2005). Tutorial in research ethics. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

Saunders, J. (2002). Research ethics committees – Time for change? Journal of the Royal College of Physicians, 2(6), 534-538.

Savulescu, J., Chalmers, I., & Blunt, J. (1996). Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability. British Medical Journal, 313 (7069), 1390-1393.

Simon, S. (2006). Stats: Steve’s attempt to teach statistics. [Online]. Children’s Mercy Hospitals & Clinics. Available: HERE

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee. (2004). Report of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. Ottawa: Interagency Advisory Panel and Secretariat on Research Ethics.

Thompson, J., Baird, P., & Downie, J. Report of the Committee of Inquiry on the case involving Dr. Nancy Olivieri, the Hospital for Sick Children, the University of Toronto, and Apotex Inc. [Online]. HERE Accessed January 4 2007

Truman, C. (2003). Ethics and the ruling relations of research production [Abstract]. Sociological Research Online, 8(1). [Online] HERE Accessed January 5 2007.

University of California at Los Angeles. (no date). Protecting human research subjects training & certification: Medical & social behavioural sciences. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

University of Toronto Committee on Human Subjects in Research. (2006). Guidelines and practices manual for research involving human subjects. Toronto: University of Toronto. [Online] Available HERE Accessed January 9 2007.

University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics. (no date). Seminar archives: e-Presence: Archived events. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

W. Maurice Young Center for Applied Ethics. (no date). Applied ethics resources on WWW: Research Ethics. [Online]. Available: HERE Accessed January 10 2007.

Walsh, M. K., McNeil, J. J., & Breen, K. J. (2005). Improving the governance of health research. Medical Journal of Australia, 182(9), 468-471.

Weijer, C. (2001). Continuing review of research approved by Canadian research ethics boards. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 164(9), 1305-1306.

Williams-Jones, B. & Holm, S. (2005). A university wide model for the ethical review of human subjects research. Research Ethics Review, 1(2), 39-44.

World Health Organization. (2000). Operational Guidelines for ethics committees that review biomedical research. WHO: Geneva.

Wunnenberg, K. L., Hanna, K. E., & Rodriguez, L. L. (2003). Responsible research: A systems approach to protecting research participants. Washington DC: National Academy Press.